BB: 7 anti-fascists sentenced to severe penalties!

police make their statements
The first of 5 charged police officers are being asked in the hall. Starting with the retired detective chief Ott whose role on 16 February was "to drive the car parks to watch from where people go" around the NPD concert in Sindelfingen. During the same night he had seen with his colleagues Ziegler, as "five people who were dressed in carnival moderate" left the NPD party. Already this fall discrepancies to the testimony of other witnesses.
When the civilian police again drove off the road before the Floschenstadion Sindelfingen, where they discovered a fight. While the attacker fled, leaving the police their car and talked briefly with the people on the ground and told them they should wait until the police arrive. Then they were re-entered and the vehicle in flight in the direction of the people down. " After about a hundred yards they stopped at a Y-shaped intersection. In one of the crossing streets started two vehicles that were passing behind the civilian vehicle. The civilian vehicle followed the vehicle without being seen as a vehicle of the police to give. After a chase movie tire the seven defendants were arrested. A
the trial takes its course for the remainder of the trial
are still charged more police officers. Some of the defenders do not know that they are loaded. Specific new information or evidence can not be established. The neo-Nazi Thomas P.
brings new mood in the auditorium. The 26-year-old, in Erfurt resident baker, begins his remarks by stating: "The first time was I've seen from the Regional Association of carnival event. Then follow the hair-raising tales pose new contradictions and strengthen old ones. Even his core message: "A sawed-off Billiardkö I was cut in the face, then I went to the ground "is not tenable when asked to.
DNA analysis provides no evidence
Even the experts Molkularbiologe Dr. Schaaf can fit in the analysis of DNA material evidence. Three results and two mixed profiles were observed on the ten Aservaten. Since seven of the "Aservate" from the vehicles of the defendants are no surprise in the much. Surprising, however, is to be found in any of the Aservate blood could.
forms of defense are blocked
early in the morning featured the Prozessbeteilligten lack of information regarding the found Aservate fixed. The person in charge, Detective Chief Superintendent Ziegler will be charged again for the afternoon and bring this to the police investigation file. In the further question of Ziegler draws from this "e-file" multiple photos from the "police identification treatment" of the accused shows that are in opposition to the expenditure incurred by all the witnesses description of the perpetrator. The request of the defense to make this document accessible because "further exculpatory material" can be referred to in this document is rejected at the hearing.
Another request by the defense to a witness statement, an interrogator is rejected in the same breath. The police officer should testify that the have reported neo pressing in his earlier interviews never batons. Since no other witness by an application of "batons", reported the allegation of grievous bodily harm would have become obsolete.
prosecutor sees clear chain of evidence
The prosecution sees in her plea "the alleged offense of bodily injury than proven. Accordingly, high falls out of her sentencing. For three of the defendants it calls for a year and six months imprisonment established facts such as that none of the accused was wearing at the time of arrest "dark" clothes, as all the witnesses claimed consistently appear, no weight have to.
lawyers demand acquittal
In her pleadings the defenders paid out on several occasions a lack of chain of evidence. In particular, the fact that none of the defendants is a direct complicity can be established is a central part of the argument. Also on several occasions, the suspicion that a "ready-made verdict" EXIST. In the direction of the prosecution allegations are raised that they, as defined by their exercise if the cherry-picking statements will reflect their charge concept. The court notes the contradictions and inconsistencies that have been highlighted by the defenders nice smile note.
The verdict Already a riot breaks out
contact with the collection process for sentencing in a number of visitors from the court. Three of the defendants to serve a Freiheitsstafe of one year and four months. The remaining five get nine and ten months on probation during the court's opinion is it a number of interjections. When the judge wants to determine the identity of a woman who has called, that the ruling had already prefabricated, multiple process participants to show solidarity and also give from their personal information. Then the judge would clear the room. After clarifying the viewers that they have no intention to leave the room, he continues in his explanation. "There is no evidence, there is only circumstantial evidence ..." Are interrupted his remarks by several people that do away with with a loud slamming of the hall door. Then a fine will be imposed of 300 € for a process visitor. Before the courtroom breaks now also made of turmoil. Other process visitors want to leave the room to be, but stopped by the police. One of the defendants also would like to leave the courtroom, the judge him rightly points out loud.
The attempt of Conclusion
During the sentencing process referred to several visitors the verdict as a scandal. Although neither the basis of the completeness the evidence was filled with several claims of the lawyers have been rejected and there was no direct evidence of the complicity of the defendants sentenced by the judge three of the accused to a prison sentence of one year and four months, which were not due to their criminal history suspended. If the judge's decision should have on hand, the prison terms of one year and 9 months to 2 years and 4 months old. The other defendants were sentenced to several months of imprisonment on probation. One of the defendants was 10 months, the others sentenced three to nine months to three years probation. We think this verdict
a scandal. It highlights the political nature of the process.
remains for us anti-fascism, at all levels, by all means, legitimate!